MEXT Working Group                                         Hong-Ke Zhang 
    Internet Draft                                            Zhi-Wei Yan 
    Expires: April 2009                                      Hua-Chun Zhou 
                                                             Si-Dong Zhang 
                                                            Jian-Feng Guan 
                                               Beijing Jiaotong University 
                                                          October 20, 2008 
                                          
         Extension of Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration for Handover 
                      draft-zhang-mext-mcoa-extension-00.txt 


    Status of this Memo 

       By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that       
       any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is       
       aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she       
       becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of       
       BCP 79. 

       Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
       Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that 
       other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. 

       Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 
       and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 
       time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 
       material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 

       The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
            http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt 

       The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
            http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 

       This Internet-Draft will expire on April 20,2009. 

     Abstract 

       The Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration [2] is a useful protocol 
       which allows a mobile node to get Internet access through multiple 
       accesses simultaneously, in which case the mobile node would be 
       configured with multiple active IPv6 care-of addresses. It proposes 
       extensions to the Mobile IPv6 protocol to register and use multiple 
       care-of addresses with the Binding Identifier Mobility Option. This 
       document describes a simple extension to Binding Identifier Mobility 
       Option to allow mobile node to select the most wanted link for the 
       ongoing service. 


     
     
     
    Zhang et al.           Expires April 20, 2009                 [Page 1] 
     
    Internet-Draft             McoA Extension                 October 2008 
        

    Conventions used in this document 

       The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
       "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 
       document are to be interpreted as described in [1]. 

    Table of Contents 

        
       1. Introduction................................................2 
       2. Extended Binding Identifier Mobility Option..................2 
       3. Security Considerations......................................5 
       4. References..................................................5 
       Author's Addresses.............................................5 
       Intellectual Property Statement.................................5 
       Full Copyright Statement........................................6 
       Acknowledgment.................................................6 
        
      1. Introduction 

       The Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration [2] document proposes 
       extensions to Mobile IPv6 to allow a mobile node to register multiple 
       care-of addresses for a home address and create multiple binding 
       cache entries. The BID information stored in the Binding Identifier 
       Mobility Option is created for each binding the mobile node wants to 
       create and sent in the binding update. However, The Multiple Care-of 
       Addresses Registration [2] document mainly focuses on how to 
       establish and remove the multiple bindings and does not solve the 
       handover using from one binging to another which is a very actual 
       problem. The extension to the Binding Identifier Mobility Option 
       proposed in this document allows mobile node to notify corresponding 
       entity (Home Agent or Corresponding Node) of the most wanted using 
       link for the ongoing communication. 

      2. Extended Binding Identifier Mobility Option 

       The following (Figure 1) is the definition of the extended format of 
       Binding Identifier Mobility Option. 

        

        

        

        

     
     
    Zhang et al.           Expires April 20, 2009                 [Page 2] 
        
    Internet-Draft             McoA Extension                 October 2008 
        

          1                             2                               3 

               0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 

                                              +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 

                                              |   Type = TBD  |     Length    | 

              +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 

              |       Binding ID (BID)        |     Status    |O|H|D| Reserved| 

              +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-------------------------------+ 

              |      Using Binding ID (UBID)  |             Reserved          | 

              +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-------------------------------+ 

              +                                                               + 

              :                 IPv4 or IPv6 care-of address (CoA)            : 

              +                                                               + 

              +---------------------------------------------------------------+ 

                              Figure 1: Extended BID Mobility Option 

       Type 

       Type value for Binding Identifier is TBD 

       Length 

       8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the option, in octets, excluding 
       the Type and Length fields.  It MUST be set to either 6, 14, or 22 
       depending on the care-of address field.  When the care-of address is 
       not carried by this option, the length value MUST be set to 6.  If 
       the IPv4 care-of address is stored in the care-of address field, the 
       length MUST be 14.  Otherwise, the Length value MUST be set to 22 for 
       IPv6 care-of address. 

       Binding ID (BID) 

    The BID which is assigned to the binding indicated by the care-of 
    address in the Binding Update or the BID mobility option. The BID is a 

     
     
    Zhang et al.           Expires April 20, 2009                 [Page 3] 
        
    Internet-Draft             McoA Extension                 October 2008 
        

    16-bit unsigned integer.  The value of zero is reserved and MUST NOT be 
    used. 

       Status 

    When the Binding Identifier mobility option is included in a Binding 
    Acknowledgement, this field overwrites the status field in the Binding 
    Acknowledgement.  If this field is zero, the receiver MUST use the 
    registration status stored in the Binding Acknowledgement message.  
    This Status field is also used to carry error information related to 
    the care-of address test in the Care-of Test message.  The status is 8-
    bit unsigned integer.  The possible status codes are the same as the 
    status codes of Binding Acknowledgement. 

       Overwrite (O) flag 

    When this flag is set, a mobile node requests the recipient to replace 
    all the bindings to binding entries stored in a Binding Update. 

       Simultaneous Home and Foreign Binding (H) flag 

    This flag indicates that the mobile node registers multiple bindings to 
    the home agent while is attached to the home link. This flag is valid 
    only for a Binding Update sent to the home agent. 

    Using BID changing (D) flag 

    When this flag is set, the mobile node requests the recipient to use 
    the binding identified by the BID and stop using the binding identified 
    by the UBID stored in the Using BID space. 

       Reserved 

    4 bits Reserved field.  The reserved field MUST be zero. 

       Using Binding ID (UBID) 

    The Using BID indicates the active binding which is used for the 
    ongoing communication. The BID is a 16-bit unsigned integer.  The value 
    of zero is reserved and MUST NOT be used. 

       Care-of Address 

    This field has the variable length depending on the specified flags.  
    Either IPv4 or IPv6 care-of address for the corresponding BID can be 
    stored in this field.  This field MUST NOT be used if a Binding 

     
     
    Zhang et al.           Expires April 20, 2009                 [Page 4] 
        
    Internet-Draft             McoA Extension                 October 2008 
        

    Identifier mobility option is included in any other message other than 
    a Binding Update. 

      3. Security Considerations 

       This document introduces a new Multiple Care-of Addresses 
       Registration extension that is used to change the link for the 
       ongoing communication among the multiple links corresponding to 
       multiple bindings. The BID Mobility option messages that carry this 
       extension MUST be authenticated as described in [1], unless other 
       authentication methods have been agreed upon. Therefore, this 
       extension does not lessen the security of Multiple Care-of Addresses 
       Registration protocol.  

      4. References 

       [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement 
             Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. 

       [2]  R. Wakikawa et al., "Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration", 
             working in progress, draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-08.txt, 
             2008. 

    Author's Addresses 

       Hong-Ke Zhang, Zhi-Wei Yan, Hua-Chun Zhou, Si-Dong Zhang, Jian-Feng 
       Guan 
       NGI Research Center 
       Beijing Jiaotong University of China 
          
       Phone: +861051685677 
       Email:hkzhang@bjtu.edu.cn 
           06120232@bjtu.edu.cn 
           hchzhou@bjtu.edu.cn 
           sdzhang@center.njtu.edu.cn 
           guanjian8632@163.com 

     

    Intellectual Property Statement 

       The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any 
       Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to 
       pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in 
       this document or the extent to which any license under such rights 
       might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has 
       made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information 
     
     
    Zhang et al.           Expires April 20, 2009                 [Page 5] 
        
    Internet-Draft             McoA Extension                 October 2008 
        

       on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be 
       found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. 

       Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any 
       assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an 
       attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of 
       such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this 
       specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at 
       http://www.ietf.org/ipr. 

       The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any 
       copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary 
       rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement 
       this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at 
       ietf-ipr@ietf.org. 

    Full Copyright Statement 

       Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). 

       This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions 
       contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors 
       retain all their rights. 

       This document and the information contained herein are provided on an 
       "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS 
       OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, The IETF TRUST AND 
       THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS 
       OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF 
       THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED 
       WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 

    Acknowledgment 

       Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the 
       Internet Society. 

        








     
     
    Zhang et al.           Expires April 20, 2009                 [Page 6]