Network Working Group                                        R. Atarashi
Internet-Draft                                               M. Ninomiya
Intended status: Informational            Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
Expires: May 6, 2009                                    November 2, 2008


                 The Model for Net and App Interaction
                     draft-atarashi-netappmodel-01

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on May 6, 2009.


















Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 1]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


Abstract

   This document describes the model for application and network
   interaction in reaction to Application Area Architecture Workshop
   held on February 11 and 12, 2008.  There is not completed mechanism
   for collaboration between application and network yet even though a
   solution is required.  The model proposed in this document is
   designed without a layer violation.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.1.  Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.2.  Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.3.  Requirements notation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  Adding Building Block  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   3.  Network and Application Interaction  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   4.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   5.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 10





























Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 2]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


1.  Introduction

   This document describes the model for application and network
   interaction in reaction to Application Area Architecture Workshop
   held on February 11 and 12, 2008.  There is not completed mechanism
   for collaboration between application and network yet even though a
   solution is required.  The model proposed in this document is
   designed without a layer violation.

1.1.  Motivation

   From the application point of view, application users want to use
   network resources (ex. bandwidth, response time) and new network
   functions (ex.  QoS, VLAN) flexibly.  Applications and services have
   requirements for network behavior depending on the functions provided
   by the application.  For example, a streaming service requires high
   bandwidth and low delay network, database transactions need no
   packet-loss network but don't need high bandwidth.
   From the network point of view, it is useful for operation to know
   the application behavior.  If they can know the requirement from
   application, it may be possible to prepare the responded environment.
   It was impossible to change the configurations on demand, but NETCONF
   can be change the configuration flexibly.
   Now, it is ready to design the application common architecture,
   because the components are all together.

1.2.  Problems

   One of the reasons that the collaboration is difficult is that we
   don't share a common architecture and terminology.  There is a gap
   between application requirements and network functions.  Application
   requirements and behavior are defined by service level, but network
   functions are implemented by routing and low level configurations.
   When we have a requirement for network behavior, we have to configure
   routers using CLI (Command Line Interface).  It is hard because we
   have to master router configuration.  And it is impossible that
   configuration changes automatically and frequently.
   We need an interface to collaborate between the applications and the
   network.  IMO, the interface is defined not API-like function, but
   also model-like description.  For example,

      - Application service model

      - Network function model

   These kinds of models may be higher level concept than API.  As a
   application user for the NETCONF, the guideline is need to use and
   combine the application technologies and protocols.



Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 3]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


1.3.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].














































Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 4]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


2.  Adding Building Block

   At the Application Area Architecture Workshop, we agreed to add the
   application *semantic* layer which is really what users are
   interested in, and this is different even from the application
   *protocol* layer.  For example, "jabber" is in the Semantic Layer,
   "xmpp" is in the Protocol Layer.

        Layer              examples

   +-----------------+    +----------+
   | Semantic Layer  |    | jabber   |
   +-----------------+    +----------+
   | Protocol Layer  |    |  xmpp    |
   +-----------------+    +----------+
   | Transport Layer |    | TCP/SCTP |
   +-----------------+    +----------+
   | Internet Layer  |    | IP/IPv6  |
   +-----------------+    +----------+
   | Datalink Layer  |    | VLAN     |
   +-----------------+    +----------+
   | Physical Layer  |    | Ethernet |
   +-----------------+    +----------+




























Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 5]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


3.  Network and Application Interaction

   In order to implement to interact with application and network,
   *Nanagement function* is needed outside the layer.  Each layer is
   managed by the management function.  The requirements from the
   Semantic Layer are conveyed to the management function to implement
   in the other layer.  For example, a "closed network" is requested
   from the application, an VLAN is implemented in the Datalink Layer.

   +-----------------+    +------------+
   | Semantic Layer  |<-->|            |
   +-----------------+    |            |
   | Protocol Layer  |<-->|            |
   +-----------------+    |            |
   | Transport Layer |<-->|            |
   +-----------------+    | management |
   | Internet Layer  |<-->|            |
   +-----------------+    |            |
   | Datalink Layer  |<-->|            |
   +-----------------+    |            |
   | Physical Layer  |<-->|            |
   +-----------------+    +------------+

   Management function consists of Managemeng Block and APIs to
   collaborate with each layer and application, network devices.
   Management block is application or management scenario suite.
   Applications make requirement to Managemeng Block through the API,
   Network devices are configured by Management Block through the API.

   +-----------------+    +---+-------------+---+
   | Semantic Layer  |<-->|   |             |   |
   +-----------------+    |   |             |   |requirements
   | Protocol Layer  |<-->|   |             |   |<-----> Applications
   +-----------------+    |   |             |   |
   | Transport Layer |<-->| A |             | A |
   +-----------------+    | P |  Management | P |configuration
   | Internet Layer  |<-->| I |   Block     | I |<-----> Network Devices
   +-----------------+    |   |             |   |
   | Datalink Layer  |<-->|   |             |   |
   +-----------------+    |   |             |   |
   | Physical Layer  |<-->|   |             |   |
   +-----------------+    +---+-------------+---+









Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 6]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


4.  Security Considerations

   TBD
















































Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 7]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


5.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.















































Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 8]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


Authors' Addresses

   Ray S. Aatarashi
   Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
   Jinbocho-Mitsui Buld., 1-105 Kanda Jinbo-cho,
   Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo  101-0051
   Japan

   Phone: +81 3 5205 6464
   Email: ray@iijlab.net


   Megumi Ninomiya
   Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
   Jinbocho-Mitsui Buld., 1-105 Kanda Jinbo-cho,
   Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo  101-0051
   Japan

   Phone: +81 3 5205 6464
   Email: ninomiya@iij.ad.jp































Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                  [Page 9]

Internet-Draft    The Model for Net and App Interaction    November 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.











Atarashi & Ninomiya        Expires May 6, 2009                 [Page 10]